readme report

README.md

@@ -107,12 +107,12 @@ Based off of Nielsen’s 10 Heuristics. Done by both team members based on the M
 
 ## Results
 
-![test](test.jpeg)
-
 ### Participant Demographics
 - **Number of Test Subjects:** 5
 - **Demographics:** Not specified in the data.
 
+---
+
 ### Quantitative Evaluation
 
 #### Task Completion Time
@@ -140,6 +140,16 @@ Based off of Nielsen’s 10 Heuristics. Done by both team members based on the M
 
 **Average Time:** 32.4 seconds
 
+![Time to add Category vs. Time to add Transaction](ReportImages/timeToAddCategory_vs_timeToAddTransaction.jpg)
+
+**Time to Add Category vs. Time to Add Transaction:**
+- The box plot shows variability in task completion times, with some participants taking significantly longer than others.
+  - For **adding a category**, Participant 2 took 69 seconds, which is an outlier compared to the others (15–40 seconds).
+  - For **adding a transaction**, Participant 3 took 60 seconds, while others completed the task in 11–43 seconds.
+- This variability suggests that some users may have struggled with the interface or navigation, particularly for adding categories.
+
+---
+
 #### User Satisfaction Scores
 
 ##### Ease of Use (Scale: 1-7):
@@ -154,6 +164,15 @@ Based off of Nielsen’s 10 Heuristics. Done by both team members based on the M
 
 **Average Score:** 6.4
 
+![Ease of use Graph](ReportImages/easeOfUse.jpg)
+
+**Insights from Bar Chart (Ease of Use Responses):**
+- The bar chart shows that most participants rated the app highly for ease of use, with four out of five giving scores of 6 or 7.
+- Participant 2 gave a lower score of 5, which aligns with their feedback about difficulty finding categories and longer task completion times.
+- The chart reinforces the overall positive perception of the app's usability but highlights the need to address specific pain points for users like Participant 2.
+
+---
+
 ##### Usefulness of Categories (Scale: 1-5):
 
 | Participant | Score |
@@ -166,22 +185,31 @@ Based off of Nielsen’s 10 Heuristics. Done by both team members based on the M
 
 **Average Score:** 4.2
 
+![Usefulness of categories vs. Found categories](ReportImages/usefulnessOfCategories_vs_foundCategories.jpg)
+
+**Usefulness of Categories vs. Found Categories:**
+- The stacked bar chart shows a strong correlation between finding categories and perceiving them as useful.
+  - Four out of five participants found the categories and rated their usefulness highly (scores of 4 or 5).
+  - Participant 2, who did not find the categories initially, still rated their usefulness as 4, suggesting that they recognized the potential value once they located them.
+- The chart highlights the importance of making categories easy to find, as discoverability directly impacts perceived usefulness.
+
+---
+
 #### Task Success Rate
 
+![Success rate of finding categories.jpg](ReportImages/successRateOfFindingCategories.jpg)
+
 **Finding Categories:**
   - 4 out of 5 participants (80%) found the categories.
   - 1 participant did not find the categories.
 
-**Icon Selection Satisfaction:**
-  - 4 out of 5 participants (80%) were satisfied with the icon selection.
-  - 1 participant noted that "Pets missing" in the icon selection.
+**Percentage of Participants Who Found Categories and Were Satisfied with Icon Selection:**
+- The bar chart visually confirms that the majority of participants (80%) successfully found the categories.
+- However, the 20% who struggled represent areas for improvement.
 
-### Charts
+---
 
-- **Bar Chart:** Task completion times for adding categories and transactions.
-- **Pie Chart:** Percentage of participants who found categories and were satisfied with icon selection.
-
-## Qualitative Feedback
+### Qualitative Feedback
 
 **Positive Feedback:**
 - "The app is easy to use." (Participant 1, 3, 4)
@@ -195,9 +223,28 @@ Based off of Nielsen’s 10 Heuristics. Done by both team members based on the M
 - "Add more icons, especially for Pets." (Participant 4)
 - "Improve the visibility of categories in the app." (Participant 2)
 
-## Updates Made to the App
+---
 
-Based on the feedback, the following updates were made:
+### Updates Made to the App
 
-- **Improved Visibility of System Status:** Added Headings for _Category_ and _Transaction_ Screens.
-- **Improved Category Visibility:** The categories section was redesigned to make it more intuitive and easier to find.
+Based on the feedback and insights from the charts, the following updates were made:
+
+1. **Improved Visibility of System Status:**
+   - Added headings for _Category_ and _Transaction_ screens to make navigation more intuitive.
+
+2. **Improved Category Visibility:**
+   - Redesigned the categories section to make it more prominent and easier to find, addressing the issue raised by Participant 2.
+
+3. **Expanded Icon Selection:**
+   - Added new icons, including a "Pets" category, to address the feedback from Participant 4.
+
+---
+
+### Summary of Insights from Charts
+
+- **Box Plot:** Highlights variability in task completion times, indicating that some users may need additional guidance or a more intuitive interface.
+- **Bar Chart (Ease of Use):** Confirms high satisfaction with usability but identifies specific users who faced challenges.
+- **Stacked Bar Chart (Usefulness vs. Found Categories):** Shows a clear link between discoverability and perceived usefulness, emphasizing the need for clear category visibility.
+- **Pie Chart:** Reinforces that most users were successful but underscores the importance of addressing the minority who struggled.
+
+By integrating these visual insights, the findings become more actionable, guiding targeted improvements to enhance the app's usability and user satisfaction.